The Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR) is used in cost accounting to allocate overhead costs to products or jobs based on a chosen activity base.
Where the activity level could be:
-
Direct labour hours
- Machine hours
- Direct labour cost
- Units produced
Example:
If total budgeted overheads are RM100,000, and budgeted labour hours are 25,000 hours:
1) Blanket (Plant-wide) OAR
What it is: One rate for the whole factory.
Formula:
Common bases: Direct labour hours (DLH), machine hours (MH), or direct labour cost.
Use when:
-
Small, homogeneous production (similar products/processes).
- Overheads are driven mainly by one dominant factor (e.g., all work is labour-intensive).
Pros: Simple, fast, low admin.
Cons: Risk of distortion if departments differ (labour vs machine intensity, setup complexity, etc.).
Mini-example:
Budgeted OH RM600k; total MH 120k → OAR = RM5/MH.
2) Departmental OAR
What it is: Different OARs for each production (and sometimes service) department.
Formula (per dept):
Common bases:
-
Machining dept: MH
- Assembly dept: DLH
- Finishing/QA: Inspection hours or DLH
Use when:
-
Departments have different cost structures and activity drivers.
- Product flows through multiple departments with varying resource intensity.
Pros: More accurate than blanket rates; matches cost behaviour by area.
Cons: More data and admin; still volume-based, so some distortion may remain.
Mini-example:
Machining OH RM300k / 50k MH → RM6/MH; Assembly OH RM200k / 40k DLH → RM5/DLH.
What it is: Finer granularity than departmental—rates by work centre, machine group, or operation.
Use when:
-
Significant intra-department variation (e.g., CNC vs manual lathe cells).
- High product diversity and route-specific resource use.
Pros: Highest precision within volume-based methods.
Cons: Data-heavy; requires robust routing/time data.
What it is: Absorb OH using activity drivers (setups, material moves, orders, inspections).
Formula (per activity):
Use when:
-
Overheads are driven by non-volume factors (complexity, batch/product sustaining work).
- Product mix is diverse (low-volume/custom jobs alongside high-volume simples).
Pros: Best cause-and-effect accuracy; reveals cross-subsidies.
Cons: More complex to build/maintain.
*Technically ABC uses “driver rates” rather than traditional OARs, but in practice they play the same role: assigning OH to cost objects.
5) Service Department Rates (for Reapportionment)
Cons: Extra step; basis choice matters (e.g., maintenance hours, #requisitions).
Choosing the Absorption Base (Quick Rules)
-
Labour-intensive dept: Use DLH or DL cost.
- Machine-intensive dept: Use MH.
- Setup-driven overheads: Use # of setups or setup hours (ABC style)
- Material-handling-driven: Use # of moves or kg/tons handled (ABC style).
- Quality/inspection costs: Use inspection hours/occurrences (ABC style).
- Facility-sustaining (e.g., HQ rent): Avoid forcing to units; disclose separately or allocate cautiously.
Predetermined vs Actual Rates (when setting OAR)
-
Predetermined (Budgeted) OAR = Budgeted OH ÷ Budgeted activity
-
Use: Planning, standard costing, and timely costing during the period.
- Leads to under/over-absorption that you reconcile at period end.
-
- Actual OAR = Actual OH ÷ Actual activity
-
-
Use: Ex-post analysis; not practical for real-time pricing/costing.
-
Quick “Which One Should I Use?” Cheats
-
Small, simple plant → Blanket OAR.
- Different departments (machining vs assembly) → Departmental OAR.
- Different cells inside departments → Cost-centre/operation OAR.
- Complexity & batch effects dominate → ABC driver rates.
- Heavy support functions used unevenly → Reapportion service dept costs first.
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan